Call for revocation of Ramla development permit
Email Story
Print Story
- Permit to develop villas on a public road at Ramla
- Technical Reports on Ramla Development published
- The case of the development of villas at Ramla Bay: A declared misdeed
- Ramla Bay Planning Appeals - The Save Ramla Committee
- Enforcement notice requested on Ulysses Lodge site at Ramla
- MEPA silent on illegal development at site of Ulysses Lodge
- MEPA revokes Mistra outdoor disco permit
- MEPA revokes the Ramla l-Hamra development permit
- MEPA ‘assessing’ request to revoke Ramla permit
- Save Ramla Committee fears revival of development permit
- NTM & AD welcome MEPA decision on Mistra
- MEPA must respect the intelligence of the people
- Registration of Waste Management Facilities by MEPA
- MEPA planning statistics for May 2008 released
- MEPA - The revoking of the Ramla development permits
Email Story
Print Story
A detailed report was submitted to the Malta Environment and Planning Authority, MEPA, earlier last week, requesting the withdrawal of the outline planning permit for the development of villas on the site of Ulysses Lodge at Ramla Bay. The report was prepared by environmental planning consultant Perit Lino Bianco on behalf of Carmen Bajada, a resident and local councillor in Xaghra Local Council.
A press release received from the Save Ramla Committee said, “Perit Lino Bianco has submitted substantial proof to MEPA that the planning application, subject to which the outline permit was issued, contained information that is ‘false, misleading or incorrect’ in terms of Article 39A of the Development Planning Act, which information has a material bearing on the issue of the planning permit.”
The press release concluded, “On the site, there are a number of applications and permits which were not declared in the planning application, nor consulted by MEPA during the planning process, which applications and permits were known to exist on site by the architectural practice submitting the application, as the same office was involved in all past applications and permits. Also, Perit Bianco submitted proof that half the area for the proposed complex of dwelling units, declared as ‘developed and disturbed land’, is not covered by a development permit.”
In the report, Perit Bianco officially requested MEPA to annul the outline planning permit issued at Ramla, rendering the full development planning permit for the same development proposal as null and void.”















You may if you wish add a comment below.