Armier - These illegal structures should all be torn down
Email Story
Print Story
- The Ramblers Association of Malta pleased at reclaimed land
- NTM welcomes steps by authorities but urges more sustainable actions
- Squatters should not be rewarded - RAM
- “ODZ is ODZ” - Or was it just election talk?
- AD joins chorus against substation at Marfa
- Ramblers Association appeal for help to regain rights to public access
- Hiker ‘Evicted’ from Ta’ Cenc Claim
- A petrol station too far ? Ramblers Association
- RAM urges the new government to protect the environment
- Ramblers highlight illegalities at Fromm ir-Rih
- FAA responds to boycott by MEPA
- More environmental plunder at Dwerja - Ramblers association
- NGOs protest against Marsalforn beach encroachment
- The Prime Minister announces his choice for the new cabinet
- Ramblers call for permanent spring hunting ban
Email Story
Print Story
Ramblers Association of Malta learns with pleasure, from James Debono's interview with Parliamentary Secretary Jason Azzopardi (Malta Today, Aug 3, 2008), of government's intention to restore the land at Ghajn Tuffieha, currently occupied by the derelict and offensive Riviera Martinique structure, back to its original state, namely absolutely free of any buildings.
This is the way forward with this type of structure built on public land and now abandoned. Structure Plan policy CZM 3 supports this move: "Public access around the coastline immediately adjacent to the sea or at the top of cliffs (including in bays, harbours, and creeks) will be secured. This will include taking shorelands into public ownership, Government acquisition of illegal developments and encroachments, and suitable construction works."
RAM believes that the same thing should have been done with old structure at Golden Bay (Bajja tal-Mixquqa), instead of permitting an even-larger hotel that has completely closed off public access to the cliff-edge, in direct conflict with this policy.
RAM cannot, however share Dr Jason Azzopardi's view on the Armier squatters' case. He says that it is difficult to speak of illegality by the squatters when it was the state that provided them with services. This sounds very much like "Two wrongs do indeed make a right". Does any Government have the power to award public land to the few who have grabbed it illegally, and deny the same right to the many, by simply providing water and electricity? We ask Dr Azzopardi: is it not difficult to speak of legality in this case? Is this Constitutional?
RAM still insists that Government has only one honourable way forward: these illegal structures should all be torn down and the land restored to the public, its rightful owner.
Ramblers Association of Malta
















“Illegal structures must be taken down” It makes legal sense to me. But mustn’t this be related to all illegal structures present on the maltese islands?
You may if you wish add a comment below.