Only in Gozo Section Mobile Gozo News

Featuring humour and problems in Gozo - Please submit photos and details.

Letters and Opinions Letters and Opinions

Readers letters and opinions - Please feel free to submit yours.

General Public Notices Public Notices

General public notices submitted for publication on Gozo News.

Gozo News Classifieds Classified Ads

Free classified advertising service and general public notice board.

Featured Items Section Featured Items

Our Featured Items section were you may browse all of our featured items.

Translate -  English German Spanish French Italian Portuguese Russian Japanese Korean Traditional Chinese Simplified Chinese Dutch Greek       Adjust text -
Home » Local News

Ramla l-Hamra development is beyond belief - James A. Tyrrell

I have just been reading about the latest fantastic decision by MEPA to approve the development of a 23-villa tourist complex on the slopes leading to the Calypso Caves at Ramla l-Hamra.

Am I missing something here? Are MEPA not supposed to be working to protect the environment? I thought the fact that the proposed development at Hondoq ir-Rummien was even being discussed was bad enough, but that MEPA have actually approved this Ramla l-Hamra development is beyond belief.

Perhaps I’ve got MEPA’s role totally wrong here and in fact their job is to smooth the way for money grabbing developers to ruin the entire island!

Why did MEPA not ask the developer to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the development, even though failure to do so is in breach of EU regulations? Perhaps MEPA are in fact a law onto themselves? I also find it strange that MEPA asked the developer to make a number of studies, including an archaeological study, which found no particular archaeological remains. Surely any studies of this type should be carried out in a totally independent manner by an outside agency.

Do MEPA really think that the developer would report any archaeological remains if they did find them? Why would they when this would at least cause a delay in any development and possibly halt it altogether?

I would direct MEPA to their own Policy BEN 2: which states; Development will not normally be permitted if, in the opinion of the Planning Authority, it is incompatible with the good urban design, natural heritage, and environmental characteristics of existing or planned adjacent uses, and is unlikely to maintain the good visual integrity of the area in which it is located.

I would think that 23 villas stuck on a slope beneath the Calypso Caves might just be detrimental to the environmental characteristics of the area. And unless they build them underground they are bound to have an impact on the visual integrity of the area.

Dr Harry Vassallo, AD’s chairperson said that this scandalous decision taken by the MEPA board will continue to undermine MEPA’s credibility as the environmental regulator. My question would be ‘What credibility’?


RSS Feed Button

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

You may if you wish add a comment below.

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Please be nice, keep it clean and stay on topic.
Note: please ensure that you enter the simple math answer in the spam protection field.

You may use these tags with your comments:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled website. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.