Published on Tuesday, 9, June, 2009 at 18:23 in Gozo News | 4 Comments

NGOs voice concern on yet another Gozo development

Yet another Gozo development Tal-Marga Valley, QalaThe environment NGOs BirdLife Malta, Flimkien ghal Ambjent Ahjar, Friends of the Earth, GAIA Foundation, MOAM, Nature Trust (Malta) and Ramblers Association have highlighted the fact that the Authorities’ pledge to protect the countryside has once again been put into question by MEPA’s recommending the approval of a development project partially outside the development zone (ODZ) at Tal-Marga Valley, Qala, Gozo.

As in the recent Wied il-Ghasel case, the proposal to build apartments and underlying garages is unsuitable for a site that is mostly out of the building scheme. Even more seriously, the excavations will take place in the area where underground water from the aquifer flows out into the Tal-Marga Valley. Worryingly, the Case Officer Report makes no mention of a report submitted to MEPA by the Qala Local Council and drawn up by Ing. Marco Cremona, a qualified hydrologist, which states that “it is very likely that the excavations will affect the subsurface flow currently feeding the shallow wells dug in the blue clay lying immediately downstream of the site of the proposed development. This is cause for concern especially since the proposed development involves the excavation of rock (and probably clay – which is protected by law) to construct underlying garages.

Furthermore, the Gozo and Comino Local Plan designates the Tal-Marga valley as a ‘Category B’ valley where the only permitted structures are “wind-pumps, small stores, reservoirs and other limited facilities which are deemed necessary for the continuation of traditional agricultural practices and even these require mitigation measures so that the intervention blends well in the rural landscape. A strong presumption against the construction of new structures (including greenhouses) shall be also applicable to Category B valleys.” One wonders therefore how a block of flats can legally be approved by the MEPA Case Officer. The granting of this permit will have further implications for other permits for villas being requested nearby, similarly out of the development zone and in the watercourse.

The NGOs and Qala Local Council have reiterated Ing. Cremona’s December 2008 declaration to MEPA that the proposed development will intercept the subsurface water flow of the Il-Wileg, Tal-Harep and Ta’ Marga valley systems and negatively affect the yield of the shallow wells lying immediately downstream of the proposed development which the surrounding agricultural area depends on for its irrigation needs.

The NGOs also reminded the Authorities that the Nadur cemetery case has, as predicted, affected the quality of the natural spring water to the detriment of the farmers and agriculture in that area. One cannot understand how the opinion of an acknowledged expert in the field, who has carried out on-site studies, can be swept aside in recommending approval of this project which not only carries potential risks to the sustainability of the valley and acquifer, but also puts into jeopardy the livelihood of the 29 farmers who have already petitioned MEPA on this matter.

The approval of a large apartment complex and garages at Wied il-Ghasel, a villa at Bahrija right on the valley floor not two meters away from the running stream and many other structures passed off as stables, shows that contrary to all the promises that the August 2006 ODZ extensions (Rationalisation Scheme) would seal the development zones, such abusive developments have continued to be approved.

4 Comments

  1. Lesley Kreupl

    This is just so disgusting that it makes one ashamed to be associated with the Maltese Islands and Gozo in particular. Does nobody care? Does Gozo really need more apartments?

    Surely there are some honest people working for MEPA and in the government (and in the church, think of the Nadur Cemetry) – can’t they do anything about the rampant corruption/ inconsistencies taking place in the building industry? If they can’t then there is not much hope for the future of these islands!

    How terribly sad for the future generations!

  2. Swimmer

    Don’t be surprised if one day we might have an application to build a penthouse on the Castille .

    I have seen enough of this. Too much. Hasn’t the GOV got the message yet with the EU elections .

    What this all means is that people are sick and tired of this building in ODZ areas. Then comes Joe Citizen and for a small room they put him through HELL

  3. Aquifer

    Water is precious for everybody. But unfortunately in some areas water is not appreciated. Like the area in Ghajn Qasab Valley limiti to Ramla il Hamra Nadur . This aquifer is coming from a mountain and at the moment it generates about 16,000 gallons of precious water a day which is good for drinking. (water was tested at the Euro Lab in Italy)

    All this water soon is going to be destroyed forever with a cemetery. Unfortunately the Gozo church does not want to stop this project .

    So goodbye to our precious water….

  4. James A. Tyrrell

    Gonzi has already had a kick in the teeth from the country in the EU elections because of his failure to keep his promises. One of his promises, which was made before he was re-elected, was to reform Mepa. Has Mepa been reformed? No, it’s still operating in the same way as before. If you are a big developer with plenty of money you can do as you please. If you are a little farmer wanting permission to build a pump room to make your work easier you’re stuffed!

    The logical thing for Gonzi to have done was to suspend all applications until such times as Mepa reform had taken place. But then I guess logic and Governmental thinking don’t exactly go hand in hand.

Leave a Reply

*** Please note that comment spam will be automatically deleted by the system and the recorded IP blacklisted. *** *** All comments must be pertinent to the subject matter & not contain any abusive language or personal insults. *** *** We are not in any way responsible for the views expressed, they are the sole responsibility of the commenter. ***