Ramla development appeal is deferred yet again…….
- Ramla Bay Planning Appeals – The Save Ramla Committee
- Ramla appeal given the go ahead….yet again
- Call for revocation of Ramla development permit
- Enforcement notice requested on Ulysses Lodge site at Ramla
- Permit to develop villas on a public road at Ramla
- The case of the development of villas at Ramla Bay: A declared misdeed
- Technical Reports on Ramla Development published
- RAM shocked at MEPA’s rebuke of it’s Audit Officer
- Save Ramla Committee fears revival of development permit
- Notice to the public about Development Planning Applications
- MEPA silent on illegal development at site of Ulysses Lodge
- MEPA responds to Qala Development report
- Ulysses Lodge development appeal decision deferred to November 29th
- MEPA aproves turning Mgarr Hotel into block of apartments
- Minister draws line on Ta’ Cenc bungalow plans
The case relating to the revocation of development permits for the construction of villas in Ramla Bay, Gozo, by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority (MEPA), continued yesterday in front of the Planning Appeals Board.
And yet again the Planning Appeals Board has deferred the case for a preliminary decision funtil the 2nd of October 2009, with respect to the objections raised relating to underpayment of levy due to the Board.
The Planning Appeals Board has now asked the Malta Environment and Planning Authority to recalculate the amount that should be paid by the developer to lodge his appeal.
The fees for appeals are €186 or 5 per cent of the planning application fee, whichever is higher. The developer, Emidio Azzopardi has questioned the amount he has been asked to pay, arguing that the appeal fee was based on the value of the original application, saying that this was wrongly calculated as it was based on the total area and not the disturbed area.
MEPA revoked the permits following detailed reports submitted by environment planning consultant and architect Perit Lino Bianco on behalf of Carmen Bajada, a resident and local councilor in Xaghra Local Council. These reports included proof that the outline permit was issued on information that was “false, misleading or incorrect” in terms of Article 39A of the Development Planning Act.
Following yesterday’s meeting, a submission was filed by Perit Bianco requesting the Planning Appeals Board to abide with its ruling of 6th February 2009 where it had granted the applicant two calendar months to effect the necessary payment.
The Save Ramla Committee will be shortly making this submission available on its website at www.saveramla.com.














Am I missing something here? The developer failed to pay the appropriate fees required by law in order for him to lodge his appeal.
He is then given extra time to make this payment which he again fails to do. Why was he given this extra time? He failed to meet his obligations as required by law, end of story and end of application.
Now he has been given yet more time to make this payment. Is the Planning Appeals Board deliberately trying to make itself look inadequate or are they perhaps holding out in the hope of a bigger backhander?
Is this a JOKE or what. If it was Joe citizen do you think that this would have happened ? My foot.
And they try to make us believe that MEPA treats everyone the same.
This shows everyone what Mepa is with the strong and with the weak.